Creative Commons licence Attribution 2.5 (
All reuse or distribution of this work must contain somewhere a link back to the URL
Originally published in
A plain
i. Letters standard second-/third-century forms, av. 0.015. Apex above initial Θ, l.9. Ligatures: ΤΗ l.4, ΝΗ l.5, ΜΗ l.8, ΤΗ, ΤΗΝ l.10, ΠΕ, ΤΗ l.11, ΤΗ l.12, ΤΗΝ, ΠΕ l.13, ΤΗ,l.14, ΤΗ l.15, ΜΝ l.19, ΤΗΝ, ΤΗΝ l.20, ΜΕ, ΜΕ l.22, ΜΗ l.23, ΜΕ l.24, ΠΡ l.26, ΝΗ l.27, ΤΗ, ΝΤ l.28, ΤΗΝ l.29, ΤΗ, ΠΗ, ΤΕ l.31, ΤΗ, ΜΕ l.32, ΤΗ, ΝΕ l.33, ΜΗ l.35, ΜΕ, ΤΗΝ l.35, ΜΗ, ΝΗ, ΤΗ l.38, ΤΗ l.40, ΤΗΝ, ΤΗΝ, ΠΕ l.41. ii. Letters av. 0.02; apices over Ι, l.19, initial Ε, l.21. Ligatures: ΤΕ l.1, ΜΕ, ΝΕ l.3, ΤΕ l.5, ΜΗ l.11, ΤΕ l.13, ΗΜΕ, ΤΕ l.15, ΗΤ l.22..]
i. ll.5/6: πάν//[πα]ν R., πάν//[τω]ν M., W., J.
i. ll.9/10: εὐτυχῆ // [κ]ατὰ R., M., W., εὐτυχή//[μ]ατα J.
i. ll.16/17: ΑΣΚΗΣΙΝ//ΕΠΑ R., whence M., W.
i. l. 42, ΑΝΑ B., lapis; ἀλλὰ R., M., W.; ἅμα J.; ἀνὰ ἔαρ cj. Ebert.
ii. The supplements are those of Jones, unless stated.
ii. l. 3, μετρ'οἷς M.
ii. l. 9, εἴρ[ου] cj. J.; εἴρ[ης] M., from εἴρη, 'agora'; εἱρ[οῖς], for ἱερ[οῖς], E.
ii. l. 11, J. suggested ἔ[φυ as a possibility, but preferred ἔ[φη; ἐ[ρεῖ] M.; ἔ[χει] E.
ii. l. 13, J., working from a squeeze, could not know that there is no room for another letter after Υ: this therefore imposes the reading ἀγορεύει, which is assumed by E.
ii. l. 18, ΚΥΔΙΜΟ : there is no room for a further letter at the end; either a final sigma was omitted, as assumed by Jones, giving a nominative, or the omicron is a mistake for omega, giving the dative, κυδίμῳ. I slightly prefer the second interpretation, which is also that of Ebert.
ii. l. 22, {Ω]Σ J. There seem to be traces of an upright before Σ, giving ΙΣ or [ε]ἰς, as conjectured by M. and E.
i. [ - - ] since the most splendid city of the Ephesians always welcomes those who have shown zeal with testimonies that are fitting and just for their worth, and takes a share of pleasure in the advantages of all (men) as if they were her own, and (since she considers that) whatever outstanding (advantages) accrue to the good reputation of other cities from distinguished men, these are matters of (?general) good fortune; (10) and since she assigns an especial portion of her inclination towards goodwill to the most splendid city of the Aphrodisians, towards which she has many and outstanding justifications for the exchange of affection. For these reasons, (the city) has welcomed Aurelius Achilles - - who has both undertaken the training of the body, and is also most noble in training, and most dignified in his way of life and his conduct, so that in him (20) all virtue of body and soul is blended - - (has welcomed him) often, both in previous contests, which he adorned, having competed impressively and with all courage, and especially in the contest of the Olympia, because, when the city encouraged him - - as if it were his own fatherland - - to proceed to the ultimate competition, and to the category of men (30), he listened, and was persuaded by the encouragement, and defeated his opponents, and bound on the (crown of) olive with such glory that his (?display of) courage and eagerness are to be numbered among the most distinguished of contests. For these reasons it was resolved that the testimony about these events should not extend only as far as the knowledge of those who were present and (40) happened to be in the stadium at the time, but by means of this decree he should be commended even more to his fatherland.
ii. [?a couplet naming Achilles] but if you proclaim [?the prowess] of Varianus in verse, I hold the olive having defeated him; or if you praise the ephebe Arion, (superior) to grown men, against him too Zeus´ granted me the olive (wreath). In all the stadia of the nations [ ?ask] - - I am as great as none of my fellow-citizens [was able to] surpass. The throng of other crowns proclaims to you my fame, by means of, ?or in a stone image and my likeness. For I often have Pythia, and divine Olympia, defeating (my) rivals with glorious fame, while none of the men who have struggled (with me) for victory has been summoned to confront a second contest (?).
See the full discussion by Jones, 'Two inscriptions from Aphrodisias', HSCP 85 (1981), 107-29; see alsocommentary at Roueché, PPA 72.
Transcriptions (Reynolds, Roueché); publications; Boulanger notebooks.
Excavated by Boulanger, 26 October 1913 (notebook A, 75-6, no. 18, whence B 25-29, no. 18); recorded by the NYU expedition.
i. published by